• Home
  • Baldy's Bombast
  • Blondie's Bluster
  • Vinny Ravioli
  • Cool Stuff
    • Baldy's Anagrams
    • Asses of Evil
    • Music
    • Pics
    • Hope? Change? Ha!
    • Way Funny
    • Creepy
  • Previous Shows
    • 2012 May
  • About/Contact

I pledged already. Can we move on?

06/21/2011

0 Comments

 
So NBC omitted "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance. Zzzzzzzz. People seem to be more upset about that than they are about the destruction of the value of the dollar (and by extension our standard of living) by the Federal Reserve, the transfer of wealth from the middle class to giant corporations, and the war machine that marches ever onward and outward. Actually, that last one isn't so bad once you accept that the slaughter of innocents in the name of humanitarianism is, well, humanitarian.

If you don't like NBC for omitting "under God," try this: Don't ever watch NBC again. Seriously. What good will that do, you ask? Well, who knows how it will affect NBC, but you will benefit tremendously.

I've only just started and I'm already way off course. This was never meant to be about NBC's omission of "under God." After all, here's what I care (or, rather, don't care) about NBC and what they do: a rat's ass.

So while I don't care at all about NBC, I do have some questions about the Pledge of Allegiance, starting with this one: Why do we keep saying it? Seems to me that once you take a pledge, whatever you pledged is the new default setting, and silence on the issue means the pledge remains intact.

Does this sound radical? Okay, but how many times do we say our wedding vows? How many times do immigrants take an oath to their new country? How many times during a trial is a witness sworn in? How often do senators, congressman, and presidents take their oath of office? (Here's a good one: How often does the average American openly pledge allegiance to his or her parents, or children?) Admittedly, the answer to some of these examples is more than once in a lifetime (see Gingrich, Newt: serial wedding-vow sayer), but once every two years is as often as it gets (um, except Newt).

And just what does it mean to "pledge allegiance" to the republic? I know how to show my allegiance, but I'm not sure how to pledge it, unless pledging it means I promise to keep on showing it forever and ever. But if that's the case, we're back to the question about why we keep saying it. Isn't it pointless to pledge to do something I'm already doing? Why isn't the doing enough, especially after I have taken the pledge?

Look: I live my allegiance to the republic. I know its history, I pay its taxes, I obey its laws (even the really stupid ones), I understand and respect its Constitution, and I'm raising a really awesome young lady who probably understands the Constitution better than most senators. If you're already walking the walk, why is it so important to talk the talk about promising to walk the walk you're already walking? Or something like that.

JFK famously admonished us to "Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country." Um, I have never asked what my country can do for me. But now I will ask: What more should I do for my country than I already am? Should I pledge my allegiance every month? Every week? Every day? Whenever peer-pressure in a group setting demands it? The only answer, in a free society, is that the timing and text of any pledge must be determined by the individual making the pledge. Sure, there is an official Pledge of Allegiance, but since a pledge belongs to the one making it, and since any legitimate pledge must be made voluntarily, we, as Americans, are free to say whatever pledge we wish whenever we wish, even if it means amending an existing pledge. (I'm not talking about NBC here, as they were purporting to air the official Pledge.)

Allegiance, of course, is a two-way street. So if we are to follow JFK's admonition, then our servants (hah!) in Washington should "ask not what the American people can do for the country — ask what the country can do for the American people." (Alas, the mindset in Washington is: "Ask what the country can do to the American people.") Maybe we should demand that  the clowns in Washington every day recite the Pledge of Allegiance and their oath of office, plus read the Constitution (not to mention all the bills they vote on).

So maybe you're still upset with NBC. Fair enough. But ask yourself this: Which did you spend more time doing last week: watching NBC, or reading, say, the Declaration of Independence, or the Constitution, or maybe the Federalist Papers or Anti-Federalist Papers, or even the USA PATRIOT Act?

Add Comment
 

In defense of Anthony Weiner

06/13/2011

0 Comments

 
June 13, 2011


Anthony Weiner, wannabe pin-up.

Republicans screech and screech and screech for his resignation.

Democrats defend him, then bray for his resignation.

Talking heads harrumph harrumph harrumph about why he needs to go.

Seems like everyone wants Weiner roasted.

Fine. Whatever. Off with his head and all that.

Meanwhile . . .

Meanwhile . . .

Obomba, er, Oborrowa, er, Barry Soetoro, er, Harrison J. Bounel, er, that is, the guy in charge of reading scripts from White House teleprompters -- that guy -- yeah, that guy continues to ignore this campaign promise: "I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank."

Of course, the only thing the teleprompter-reader-in-chief took to the bank was a bottomless sack of bailout cash, which wasn't his to give in the first place. But . . .

But he gets a pass on the wars, now that he has discovered the importance of dropping bombs on Middle Easterners. The screeching, braying harrumphers have no problem with Obomba's bombs, because they are humanitarian bombs. Throughout history, innocents have died in the name of [peace, freedom, democracy, blah blah blah, whatever], so these humanitarianly murdered innocents, if their mouths still worked, would tell us how proud they were to die for such a noble cause, and how it was such an honor to be killed by a winner of a Nobel Peace Prize. [Here is an aside, but an important one: If your neighbor ever wins a Nobel Peace Prize, move. Or, if that's too much trouble, consider preemptively shooting him before he preemptively shoots you.]

Killing innocents? Sure, we're down with that. Inappropriate use of social networking? AAAHHHH!!!

Good thing for Obomba that he didn't Twitter while the Middle East burns. 

Add Comment
 

    Baldy's Bombast

    Picture

    Archives

    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed


© Copyright Baldy and The Blonde 2010, 2011 - All Rights Reserved. NOTICE In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., section 107, some material on this web site is provided without permission from the copyright owner, only for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research under the 'fair use' provisions of federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed further, except for 'fair use' non-profit educational purposes, without permission of the copyright owner.